Against moral arithmetic

The essay Against Moral Arithmetic challenges the tendency to quantify the value of human life in numerical terms, exploring the limitations of consequentialism and utilitarianism in ethics. Through an analysis of the Trolley Problem and the theories of philosophers such as Peter Singer, Immanuel Kant, and Judith Jarvis Thomson, it argues that moral decisions cannot be reduced to an arithmetic calculation of well-being. Instead, it advocates for a more human and contextual perspective that recognizes the uniqueness of each life and rejects the instrumentalization of individuals in the name of collective good. Continue reading Against moral arithmetic

Filosofía/Philosophy

The fallacy of poverty and the utilitarian justification of freedom

The essay explores the justification of political-socioeconomic systems from individualist and collectivist perspectives. It examines the dilemma of wealth distribution and how different philosophies, such as capitalism and socialism, address poverty and general well-being. The argument is made that individual freedom, along with the ability to achieve high states of reward, is key to prosperity and poverty eradication. Limiting freedom to combat poverty is seen as a mistake that has historically led to adverse outcomes. Ultimately, the essay emphasizes that the true solution to poverty lies in a system that enables individuals to develop their capacities and generate wealth without coercion. Continue reading The fallacy of poverty and the utilitarian justification of freedom