The essay reflects on the nature of rights and questions the notion of objective criteria independent of the subject to define them. It proposes that rights can be understood as “possibilities” and argues that the only fundamental right is the use of spaces and objects for one’s own purposes, which is related to the notion of property. The essay also addresses the role of high states of reward in the conception of rights, their limits in the political context, and the relationship between property, personal information, and conflicts. The text emphasizes that any criterion of rights must minimize conflicts to be valid. Continue reading Four short essays – 3 On Rights