Preserving Personhood and Identity: Navigating the Buddhist Implications of the “No-Self” and Circumnavigating Confusions Regarding Our Ego

Preserving Personhood and Identity: Navigating the Buddhist Implications of the “No-Self” and Circumnavigating Confusions Regarding Our Ego

This essay explores the relationship between the Buddhist concept of “no-self” and personal identity, arguing that while the teaching of anatta can be liberating, it can also create confusion and adverse effects if misinterpreted. The discussion delves into how mindfulness practice, particularly the Dzogchen approach, can lead to depersonalization if misunderstood. Drawing from philosophers and neuroscientists like Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson, Thomas Metzinger, and Antonio Damasio, the argument supports the existence of personhood and identity as a functional construct based on self-awareness. The conclusion emphasizes that rather than negating identity, meditative practice can be a powerful tool to explore and understand the nature of consciousness without falling into nihilism. Continue reading Preserving Personhood and Identity: Navigating the Buddhist Implications of the “No-Self” and Circumnavigating Confusions Regarding Our Ego

In Defense of Free Will: How Modern Materialism and Determinism Are Mistaken

In Defense of Free Will: How Modern Materialism and Determinism Are Mistaken

The debate on free will has been shaken by the rise of materialist determinism, driven by neuroscience and physics. Authors like Sam Harris argue that our decisions are mere products of neural processes and external factors, stripping consciousness of its autonomy. However, this essay challenges that perspective, exploring arguments in defense of a radical form of free will that might withstand deterministic objections. Is our will an illusion, or is there still room for true human agency? Continue reading In Defense of Free Will: How Modern Materialism and Determinism Are Mistaken

On determinism and free will – Some reflections

On determinism and free will – Some reflections

This essay explores the nature of voluntary and involuntary actions, with an emphasis on decision-making within the volitional process. It examines the neuroscientific foundations of free will and the influence of unconscious processes on decision-making. Through the analysis of theories and experiments such as those of Libet, it questions whether conscious will is truly autonomous or determined by prior causes. Additionally, it reviews the philosophical and scientific implications of materialist monism versus dualist conceptions of the mind. Continue reading On determinism and free will – Some reflections

Four short essays – 4 On Responsibility

Four short essays – 4 On Responsibility

This essay analyzes the concept of responsibility in a socio-political context, questioning the contemporary tendency to attribute guilt indiscriminately. It argues that responsibility does not imply a metaphysical obligation to act against social problems but is instead based on individual choice and the benefits it brings to a society oriented toward high states of reward. The idea that inaction equals guilt is criticized, as this perspective can lead to a life of servitude rather than a legitimate pursuit of personal fulfillment. Finally, a vision of responsibility is proposed that respects individual autonomy and fosters a balance between reciprocity and freedom. Continue reading Four short essays – 4 On Responsibility