Causality is not a law and an argument in favor of the existence of God

Causality is not a law and an argument in favor of the existence of God

This essay critically examines the principle of causality as an argument for the existence of God. It is often asserted that every event must have a cause, implying that the universe requires a creator. However, this analysis argues that causality is not a fundamental law of nature but rather a manifestation of the behavior of matter through time and structure. The discussion explores concepts such as the relationship between causality and physical laws, the role of elementary particles without cause, and why invoking God as the ultimate cause does not resolve the problem of the universe’s origin. Continue reading Causality is not a law and an argument in favor of the existence of God

Agnosticism, atheism and deism from the epistemological perspective

Agnosticism, atheism and deism from the epistemological perspective

This essay explores agnosticism, atheism, and deism from an epistemological perspective. It examines three fundamental aspects: the existence of God, the epistemological stance toward this question, and one’s personal position on its veracity. The text critically analyzes agnosticism and its relation to skepticism, as well as the possibility of proving God’s nonexistence. It questions the validity of religious claims lacking empirical evidence and discusses the logical coherence of certain divine attributes, such as omnipotence. Continue reading Agnosticism, atheism and deism from the epistemological perspective

The unmoved mover is not an argument in favor of the existence of God

The unmoved mover is not an argument in favor of the existence of God

Aristotle’s concept of the unmoved mover has been widely used to justify the existence of God. However, this essay argues that the concept does not necessarily support such a conclusion. While my perspective on this argument has evolved and is explored in depth in my book This Is It, here I offer a critical reflection on how motion and the structures of reality can be explained without invoking a transcendent being, rethinking the relationship between causality, metaphysics, and ethics. Continue reading The unmoved mover is not an argument in favor of the existence of God